Forumsee logo
Forumsee » Finance and investment » General » Read message
RSS: Subscribe to RSS

Sun Jun 07, 2015 11:42 am

Bogleheads • View forum - Investing - Theory, News & General - www.bogleheads.org
While waiting to see the doctor, I read an article in the March edition of Money Magazine titled - Can you really beat the market. It was written by Campbell Harvey, a finance professor at Duke. He was asked a series of questions about the value of rebalancing. He did not support the concept, particularly when doing it by rote, ie, at a predetermined time. He said that 'rote' rebalancing increases risk. He also said it's smarter, if you want to rebalance, to use your own judgement when and base that judgement on information in the market. His point is contrary to what I normally see when I read a topic on the benefits of rebalancing - reduce risk and perhaps, increase return. Is this just another opinion or is this professor on to something?

jte
Date: Jun 7, 2015   


Last videos:

Jack Bogle, The Only Way To Beat The Stock Market
Jack Bogle, The Only Way To Beat The Stock Market
Financial Advisor news
Financial Advisor news
Bogle himself is saying we will expect like 3% for the next decades
Bogle himself is saying we will expect like 3% for the next decades
Warren Buffett on America
Warren Buffett on America
John Bogle video
John Bogle video
Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:27 pm
Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:27 pm
North Korean missile filmed near Japan video
North Korean missile filmed near Japan video
"Warren Buffett and an Index Fund"
"Warren Buffett and an Index Fund"

Cars ·
Travel ·
Pets ·
production-frontend